B2B Experts Wiki Publishing Policy

A public knowledge platform on B2B digital commerce

Publishing Policy In A Nutshell

  • B2B Experts Wiki serves B2B professionals who make decisions or facilitate decision-making in digital transformation in B2B and, especially, B2B digital commerce. So, assets published on a portal must relate to these topics or to topics cognate to them.
  • B2B Experts Wiki serves the business audience first. So, published assets must be about business problems and business decisions written in business language. We do include articles about technology that are important for digital transformation, but only if these assets are targeted at business people and still use business language.
  • B2B Experts Wiki is not for publishing original articles. We are not publishers. We expect that there are enough channels that would fight for valuable material for a business audience. Our role is to make a perfect material easy to find for experts when needed: we evaluate the asset, classify it, add it to the appropriate collection, and add our review.
  • Even though we have some preferred publishers that we define as "trusted sources," we do not rely on the publisher brand name only. Internal and external experts support B2B Experts Wiki, and our vision of the market helps us distinguish assets that should be published from the ones that should not. We may reject the material from the sound brand and publish it from a low-cited source if we see that it brings valuable insights to our community members. Business value is the key.
  • B2B Experts Wiki is a platform for publishing articles that include facts, cases, concepts, ideas, practice descriptions, and other valuable information that might be applicable by other community members in their business context.
  • B2B Experts Wiki is not the place for selling something. We are going to protect our members from assets that include commercials, SEO articles, or stories that are selling some brand, vendor, or product. In case such sort of material appears due to having valuable insights inside it, we mark it explicitly as a risky content, so that members will decide in advance if they want to read it or not.